## Presentation on theme: “Chapter 6 – Statistical Quality Control”— Presentation transcript:

1 **Chapter 6 – Statistical Quality Control**

Operations Management by R. Dan Reid & Nada R. Sanders 4th Edition © Wiley 2010 © Wiley 2010

2 **Learning Objectives Describe categories of SQC**

Explain the use of descriptive statistics in measuring quality characteristics Identify and describe causes of variation Describe the use of control charts Identify the differences between x-bar, R-, p-, and c-charts © Wiley 2010

3 **Learning Objectives –con’t**

Explain process capability and process capability index Explain the concept six-sigma Explain the process of acceptance sampling and describe the use of OC curves Describe the challenges inherent in measuring quality in service organizations © Wiley 2010

4

Three SQC Categories Statistical quality control (SQC): the term used to describe the set of statistical tools used by quality professionals; SQC encompasses three broad categories of: Statistical process control (SPC) Descriptive statistics include the mean, standard deviation, and range Involve inspecting the output from a process Quality characteristics are measured and charted Helps identify in-process variations Acceptance sampling used to randomly inspect a batch of goods to determine acceptance/rejection Does not help to catch in-process problems © Wiley 2010

5 **Sources of Variation Variation exists in all processes.**

Variation can be categorized as either: Common or Random causes of variation, or Random causes that we cannot identify Unavoidable, e.g. slight differences in process variables like diameter, weight, service time, temperature Assignable causes of variation Causes can be identified and eliminated: poor employee training, worn tool, machine needing repair © Wiley 2010

6 **Descriptive Statistics**

Descriptive Statistics include: The Mean- measure of central tendency The Range- difference between largest/smallest observations in a set of data Standard Deviation measures the amount of data dispersion around mean Distribution of Data shape Normal or bell shaped or Skewed © Wiley 2010

7 **Distribution of Data Normal distributions Skewed distribution**

© Wiley 2010

8 **SPC Methods-Developing Control Charts**

Control Charts (aka process or QC charts) show sample data plotted on a graph with CL, UCL, and LCL Control chart for variables are used to monitor characteristics that can be measured, e.g. length, weight, diameter, time Control charts for attributes are used to monitor characteristics that have discrete values and can be counted, e.g. % defective, # of flaws in a shirt, etc. © Wiley 2010

9 **Setting Control Limits**

Percentage of values under normal curve Control limits balance risks like Type I error © Wiley 2010

10 **Control Charts for Variables**

Use x-bar and R-bar charts together Used to monitor different variables X-bar & R-bar Charts reveal different problems Is statistical control on one chart, out of control on the other chart? OK? © Wiley 2010

11 **Control Charts for Variables**

Use x-bar charts to monitor the changes in the mean of a process (central tendencies) Use R-bar charts to monitor the dispersion or variability of the process System can show acceptable central tendencies but unacceptable variability or System can show acceptable variability but unacceptable central tendencies © Wiley 2010

12 **Center line and control limit formulas**

Constructing an X-bar Chart: A quality control inspector at the Cocoa Fizz soft drink company has taken three samples with four observations each of the volume of bottles filled. If the standard deviation of the bottling operation is .2 ounces, use the below data to develop control charts with limits of 3 standard deviations for the 16 oz. bottling operation. Center line and control limit formulas Time 1 Time 2 Time 3 Observation 1 15.8 16.1 16.0 Observation 2 15.9 Observation 3 Observation 4 Sample means (X-bar) 15.875 15.975 Sample ranges (R) 0.2 0.3 © Wiley 2010

13 **Solution and Control Chart (x-bar)**

Center line (x-double bar): Control limits for±3σ limits: © Wiley 2010

14

X-Bar Control Chart © Wiley 2010

15 **Control Chart for Range (R)**

Center Line and Control Limit formulas: Factors for three sigma control limits Factor for x-Chart A2 D3 D4 2 1.88 0.00 3.27 3 1.02 2.57 4 0.73 2.28 5 0.58 2.11 6 0.48 2.00 7 0.42 0.08 1.92 8 0.37 0.14 1.86 9 0.34 0.18 1.82 10 0.31 0.22 1.78 11 0.29 0.26 1.74 12 0.27 0.28 1.72 13 0.25 1.69 14 0.24 0.33 1.67 15 0.35 1.65 Factors for R-Chart Sample Size (n) © Wiley 2010

16

R-Bar Control Chart © Wiley 2010

17 **Second Method for the X-bar Chart Using R-bar and the A2 Factor**

Use this method when sigma for the process distribution is not know Control limits solution: © Wiley 2010

18 **Control Charts for Attributes –P-Charts & C-Charts**

Attributes are discrete events: yes/no or pass/fail Use P-Charts for quality characteristics that are discrete and involve yes/no or good/bad decisions Number of leaking caulking tubes in a box of 48 Number of broken eggs in a carton Use C-Charts for discrete defects when there can be more than one defect per unit Number of flaws or stains in a carpet sample cut from a production run Number of complaints per customer at a hotel © Wiley 2010

19

P-Chart Example: A production manager for a tire company has inspected the number of defective tires in five random samples with 20 tires in each sample. The table below shows the number of defective tires in each sample of 20 tires. Calculate the control limits. Sample Number of Defective Tires Number of Tires in each Sample Proportion Defective 1 3 20 .15 2 .10 .05 4 5 Total 9 100 .09 Solution: © Wiley 2010

20

P- Control Chart © Wiley 2010

21

C-Chart Example: The number of weekly customer complaints are monitored in a large hotel using a c-chart. Develop three sigma control limits using the data table below. Week Number of Complaints 1 3 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total 22 Solution: © Wiley 2010

22

C- Control Chart © Wiley 2010

23 **Process Capability Product Specifications**

Preset product or service dimensions, tolerances: bottle fill might be 16 oz. ±.2 oz. (15.8oz.-16.2oz.) Based on how product is to be used or what the customer expects Process Capability – Cp and Cpk Assessing capability involves evaluating process variability relative to preset product or service specifications Cp assumes that the process is centered in the specification range Cpk helps to address a possible lack of centering of the process © Wiley 2010

24 **Relationship between Process Variability and Specification Width**

Three possible ranges for Cp Cp = 1, as in Fig. (a), process variability just meets specifications Cp ≤ 1, as in Fig. (b), process not capable of producing within specifications Cp ≥ 1, as in Fig. (c), process exceeds minimal specifications One shortcoming, Cp assumes that the process is centered on the specification range Cp=Cpk when process is centered © Wiley 2010

25

Computing the Cp Value at Cocoa Fizz: 3 bottling machines are being evaluated for possible use at the Fizz plant. The machines must be capable of meeting the design specification of oz. with at least a process capability index of 1.0 (Cp≥1) The table below shows the information gathered from production runs on each machine. Are they all acceptable? Solution: Machine A Machine B Cp= Machine C Machine σ USL-LSL 6σ A .05 .4 .3 B .1 .6 C .2 1.2 © Wiley 2010

26 **Computing the Cpk Value at Cocoa Fizz**

Design specifications call for a target value of 16.0 ±0.2 OZ. (USL = 16.2 & LSL = 15.8) Observed process output has now shifted and has a µ of 15.9 and a σ of 0.1 oz. Cpk is less than 1, revealing that the process is not capable © Wiley 2010

27 **±6 Sigma versus ± 3 Sigma PPM Defective for ±3σ versus ±6σ quality**

In 1980’s, Motorola coined “six-sigma” to describe their higher quality efforts Six-sigma quality standard is now a benchmark in many industries Before design, marketing ensures customer product characteristics Operations ensures that product design characteristics can be met by controlling materials and processes to 6σ levels Other functions like finance and accounting use 6σ concepts to control all of their processes © Wiley 2010

28

Acceptance Sampling Defined: the third branch of SQC refers to the process of randomly inspecting a certain number of items from a lot or batch in order to decide whether to accept or reject the entire batch Different from SPC because acceptance sampling is performed either before or after the process rather than during Sampling before typically is done to supplier material Sampling after involves sampling finished items before shipment or finished components prior to assembly Used where inspection is expensive, volume is high, or inspection is destructive © Wiley 2010

29 **Acceptance Sampling Plans**

Goal of Acceptance Sampling plans is to determine the criteria for acceptance or rejection based on: Size of the lot (N) Size of the sample (n) Number of defects above which a lot will be rejected (c) Level of confidence we wish to attain There are single, double, and multiple sampling plans Which one to use is based on cost involved, time consumed, and cost of passing on a defective item Can be used on either variable or attribute measures, but more commonly used for attributes © Wiley 2010

30 **Operating Characteristics (OC) Curves**

OC curves are graphs which show the probability of accepting a lot given various proportions of defects in the lot X-axis shows % of items that are defective in a lot- “lot quality” Y-axis shows the probability or chance of accepting a lot As proportion of defects increases, the chance of accepting lot decreases Example: 90% chance of accepting a lot with 5% defectives; 10% chance of accepting a lot with 24% defectives © Wiley 2010

31 **AQL, LTPD, Consumer’s Risk (α) & Producer’s Risk (β)**

AQL is the small % of defects that consumers are willing to accept; order of 1-2% LTPD is the upper limit of the percentage of defective items consumers are willing to tolerate Consumer’s Risk (α) is the chance of accepting a lot that contains a greater number of defects than the LTPD limit; Type II error Producer’s risk (β) is the chance a lot containing an acceptable quality level will be rejected; Type I error © Wiley 2010

32

Developing OC Curves OC curves graphically depict the discriminating power of a sampling plan Cumulative binomial tables like partial table below are used to obtain probabilities of accepting a lot given varying levels of lot defectives Top of the table shows value of p (proportion of defective items in lot), Left hand column shows values of n (sample size) and x represents the cumulative number of defects found Table 6-2 Partial Cumulative Binomial Probability Table (see Appendix C for complete table) Proportion of Items Defective (p) .05 .10 .15 .20 .25 .30 .35 .40 .45 .50 n x 5 .7738 .5905 .4437 .3277 .2373 .1681 .1160 .0778 .0503 .0313 Pac 1 .9974 .9185 .8352 .7373 .6328 .5282 .4284 .3370 .2562 .1875 AOQ .0499 .0919 .1253 .1475 .1582 .1585 .1499 .1348 .1153 .0938 © Wiley 2010

33 **Example: Constructing an OC Curve**

Lets develop an OC curve for a sampling plan in which a sample of 5 items is drawn from lots of N=1000 items The accept /reject criteria are set up in such a way that we accept a lot if no more that one defect (c=1) is found Using Table 6-2 and the row corresponding to n=5 and x=1 Note that we have a 99.74% chance of accepting a lot with 5% defects and a 73.73% chance with 20% defects © Wiley 2010

34 **Average Outgoing Quality (AOQ)**

With OC curves, the higher the quality of the lot, the higher is the chance that it will be accepted Conversely, the lower the quality of the lot, the greater is the chance that it will be rejected The average outgoing quality level of the product (AOQ) can be computed as follows: AOQ=(Pac)p Returning to the bottom line in Table 6-2, AOQ can be calculated for each proportion of defects in a lot by using the above equation This graph is for n=5 and x=1 (same as c=1) AOQ is highest for lots close to 30% defects © Wiley 2010

35 **Implications for Managers**

How much and how often to inspect? Consider product cost and product volume Consider process stability Consider lot size Where to inspect? Inbound materials Finished products Prior to costly processing Which tools to use? Control charts are best used for in-process production Acceptance sampling is best used for inbound/outbound © Wiley 2010

36

SQC in Services Service Organizations have lagged behind manufacturers in the use of statistical quality control Statistical measurements are required and it is more difficult to measure the quality of a service Services produce more intangible products Perceptions of quality are highly subjective A way to deal with service quality is to devise quantifiable measurements of the service element Check-in time at a hotel Number of complaints received per month at a restaurant Number of telephone rings before a call is answered Acceptable control limits can be developed and charted © Wiley 2010

37 **Control Chart limits for ±3 sigma limits**

Service at a bank: The Dollars Bank competes on customer service and is concerned about service time at their drive-by windows. They recently installed new system software which they hope will meet service specification limits of 5±2 minutes and have a Capability Index (Cpk) of at least 1.2. They want to also design a control chart for bank teller use. They have done some sampling recently (sample size: 4 customers) and determined that the process mean has shifted to 5.2 with a Sigma of 1.0 minutes. Control Chart limits for ±3 sigma limits © Wiley 2010

38 **SQC Across the Organization**

SQC requires input from other organizational functions, influences their success, and used in designing and evaluating their tasks Marketing – provides information on current and future quality standards Finance – responsible for placing financial values on SQC efforts Human resources – the role of workers change with SQC implementation. Requires workers with right skills Information systems – makes SQC information accessible for all. © Wiley 2010

39

Chapter 6 Highlights SQC refers to statistical tools t hat can be sued by quality professionals. SQC an be divided into three categories: traditional statistical tools, acceptance sampling, and statistical process control (SPC). Descriptive statistics are used to describe quality characteristics, such as the mean, range, and variance. Acceptance sampling is the process of randomly inspecting a sample of goods and deciding whether to accept or reject the entire lot. Statistical process control involves inspecting a random sample of output from a process and deciding whether the process in producing products with characteristics that fall within preset specifications. © Wiley 2010

40 **Chapter 6 Highlights – con’t**

Two causes of variation in the quality of a product or process: common causes and assignable causes. Common causes of variation are random causes that we cannot identify. Assignable causes of variation are those that can be identified and eliminated. A control chart is a graph used in SPC that shows whether a sample of data falls within the normal range of variation. A control chart has upper and lower control limits that separate common from assignable causes of variation. Control charts for variables monitor characteristics that can be measured and have a continuum of values, such as height, weight, or volume. Control charts fro attributes are used to monitor characteristics that have discrete values and can be counted. © Wiley 2010

41 **Chapter 6 Highlights – con’t**

Control charts for variables include x-bar and R-charts. X-bar charts monitor the mean or average value of a product characteristic. R-charts monitor the range or dispersion of the values of a product characteristic. Control charts for attributes include p-charts and c-charts. P-charts are used to monitor the proportion of defects in a sample, C-charts are used to monitor the actual number of defects in a sample. Process capability is the ability of the production process to meet or exceed preset specifications. It is measured by the process capability index Cp which is computed as the ratio of the specification width to the width of the process variable. © Wiley 2010

42 **Chapter 6 Highlights – con’t**

The term Six Sigma indicates a level of quality in which the number of defects is no more than 2.3 parts per million. The goal of acceptance sampling is to determine criteria for the desired level of confidence. Operating characteristic curves are graphs that show the discriminating power of a sampling plan. It is more difficult to measure quality in services than in manufacturing. The key is to devise quantifiable measurements for important service dimensions. © Wiley 2010

43 **Chapter 6 Homework Hints**

6.4: calculate mean and range for all 10 samples. Use Table 6-1 data to determine the UCL and LCL for the mean and range, and then plot both control charts (x-bar and r-bar). 6.8: use the data for preparing a p-bar chart. Plot the 4 additional samples to determine your “conclusions.” 6.11: determine the process capabilities (CPk) of the 3 machines and decide which are “capable.” © 2007 Wiley

## Contact Data Scientist

Dean HoffmanGet real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.